Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources
In my opinion, it is absurd argue that wild animals have no place in 21st century. First, they are many questions that pose related to this issue, for example what happened these days that this thought come to their mind? Next, earth planet was not created only for us humans. All creatures such as wild animal have a right to live here. so, none.
Wild animals have no place in our arms Ethos and Empathy
my teacher suggest me to write following way of opinion type of task 2 essay. Introduction. *general statement (rephrase topic) *opinion sentence 1. (Wild animals have no place in the 21st century) *opinion sentence 2. (so protecting them is a waste of resources) *Thesis statement (in this essay, i will discuss some arguments for and against.
50 best ideas for coloring Wild Cattle Species
"Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.. Moreover, recent research evidences show that some wild animals have skills that can complement our lives. For example, dogs can smell passengers to detect illegal items. Therefore, interfering with animals' ecosystems will have adverse effects.
Wild Animals Have No Place in The 21st Century IELTS Plaza
Disagree. 1. Importance of wildlife to maintain natural balance. 2. Benefit of creating resource to protect wildlife. -----------------------. These days the wild life is at greater risk of extinction and it is predicated that this may disappear in 21st century. It has been disagreed that preserving wild animal is waste of resources.
Wild Animals Start Roaming Quarantined Cities As People Lock Themselves Indoors
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them. Submitted by thao_yasay on Tue Aug 20 2019 Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.
Wild Animals Have No Place in The 21st Century, so Protecting Them Is a Waste of Resources
Sample 3 Wild Animals Have No Place in The 21st Century, so Protecting Them Is a Waste of Resources. Undoubtedly, wildlife is a precious gift of god to this planet. However, it is believed by some individuals that there is no need to protect wildlife by making efforts because, in the 21st century, land is scarce due to industrialisation.
Wild animals have no place in our arms Ethos and Empathy
In the recent times,natural environment have been explored to enable development. Thereby promoting the protection of wildlife. It is a debated issue whether these wild animals have no place in the 21st century and also
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources
Several people have asked me to work through the question below (which I mentioned in a lesson last month). Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The first step is to decide whether we agree, disagree or partly agree. My preference would be to 'completely disagree'. I don't think we can partly agree.
4 Amazing Animal Sanctuaries Who Need Your Help to Continue Saving Animals Animals Are Better
Sample 2: Wild Animals Have No Place in The 21st Century In this contemporary era, wild beasts have no space to Live, and giving them protection is based on money and time. This essay will highlight that this certainly is a rational approach that needs to be obtained from disagreeing sides, thus leading to a logical conclusion.
PTE Important Essay Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a
It is a ridiculous idea that wild animals have no place in the world because we have entered the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for humans, and modernization means we need to be more selfish. I would rather say that the 21st century should be the right time to make planet Earth livable for all species.
Deadly Cute But Dangerous Animals Cute But Deadly 6 Adorable Animals That Are Surprisingly
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The rate at which wildlife existence is being endangered is highly unprecedented in present times. As a result, there is a contentious argument over whether protecting wildlife is an absolute waste of time, energy and money.
BE the voice for those who have no voice! Floresta amazonica animais, Animais, Bicho de estimação
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (266 Words, 13 Sentences, 4 Paragraphs, Band 9) Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them.
Wild Animals Have No Place in Our Arms
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them. Tags. essay band 9. IELTS Essays. Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
On World Wildlife Day, a host of conservation success stories World Economic Forum
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? #animals #place #st #century #waste #resources. Some people argue that spending money on the protection of wild . animals. is pointless. I completely disagree with .
PTE Writing Essay Wild animals have no place in the 21st century Activity 5
In the 20th century, contact between many different parts of the world has developed apidly through air travel and telecommunications. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Nowadays, the advent of advanced innovations in transport and telecommunication aids people in contact with each other throughout the world.
Elephants and Other Wildlife Rely on the World's Protected Areas HuffPost
The question below contains 2 ideas or statements, highlighted in blue and green. Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? A student, Raymond, asked which part of this question we should answer. Should we agree or disagree with just the blue part, just the green part, or both parts?